The fact that wind turbines trip out if the supply from conventional generators
fails coupled with the intermittent nature of wind energy make it
difficult for the national grid to take much power from them. Efforts are
being made to beat these problems.
The ESB National Grid is Ireland's
Transmission System Operator and this paper
about renewable energy is written from that
perspective. First, I will introduce the role and
responsibilites of a Transmission System
Operator (TSO); I will then discuss the impact
of changes in the way electricity is generated on
the system's development; and finally look at
some TSO initiatives. I will use the three-letter
acronym TSO because it makes my presentation
a little easier.
The TSO is responsible for the development,
operation, and maintenance of the transmission
system. Although the role of the TSO role is
currently filled by ESB National Grid, it will be
performed by EirGrid when the infrastructure
agreement and transfer agreement between ESB
and EirGrid are complete.
A transmission system is a mesh or a network
which means in electrical terms it is normally
closed and it is designed to withstand the loss of
any single item of plant without the system
going outside set standards. Flows can go in
either direction along the lines and it is normally
used for the delivery of bulk supply to the
distribution network which is shown in Figure
5B2 as a radial or normally open system.
Normally, electricity flows from the transmission
system to the distribution system, and on to
the local customers. However, if a generator is
embedded in the distribution system, the flows
can also go in either direction.
One of the advantages of the network aspect of
the transmission system is the high level of
security and continuity it gives. Both of these
are very important, obviously, for our major
industrial customers. Indeed one of their main
issues when they meet us is the levels of quality
and continuity that they can expect. The disadvantage
is that a connection, be it an
increased demand, or increased generation, at
one node can cause changes throughout the network
and at quite remote points, which makes
the system more complicated to operate and
control, whereas with a radial system the loads
and demands and generation on any branch can
be calculated by a simple arithmetic sum.
Basically, though, in the Irish system, the
Transmission System Operator looks after the
transmission system and the Distribution
System Operator looks after the distribution
system.
Another comment on our system: it is a small
island system. I read something recently by an
academic in the UK who had described the UK
system as an island electricity system, so certainly
I think we could regard Ireland as a small
island system. Our generated system peak is
just over 4000 megawatts with a summer night
valley or minimum load at just less than 1500
megawatts. We are lightly interconnected with
Northern Ireland, which is lightly interconnected
with the UK. As a result, a small amount of
generation in European terms, say, 400
megawatts, has a big impact on our system.
The TSO's responsibility is to maintain, operate
and, if necessary, develop a safe, secure, reliable,
economic and efficient electricity transmission
system and to explore and develop
opportunities for interconnecting that system
with other systems so that all reasonable
demands for electricity are met while having
due regard to the environment. That is the context
in which we are operating.
So what impact will the development of many
more electricity sources have on system development
for the TSO in Ireland? What changes
are we seeing? On the traditional thermal side,
we are certainly seeing an increase in unit size,
up to 600 megawatts now being typical and
possibly even larger for nuclear stations. This
has transmission system and reserve implications
for the Transmission System Operator. On
reserve requirements, our current standard is
that we must have the ability to withstand the
loss of our largest generator, so as the single
largest unit increases, that has implications for
us.
There is now an increasing proportion of
renewables in the overall generation mix. Small
synchronous generators using predictable fuel
sources create no new issues for a Transmission
System Operator. If they act very much the
same as any other generator, they really make
no difference from the point of view of a system
planner. But of all the renewable generation
sources, wind, a very large natural resource
in Ireland, does pose a great challenge for TSO,
for two main reasons. One is the operating
characteristics of wind turbine generation.
Intermittence is one everyone is familiar with.
The other is fault ride-through, the ability of the
generator to stay connected when there is a
fault on the system. I'll go into that in a little
more detail. As I explained earlier, we have to
be able to withstand the loss of our largest generator
but, with current wind turbine technology,
our dynamic models tell us that whenever
we have, say, a cable fault close to, for example,
our largest 400-megawatt generator on the
system, Synergen, in Dublin, that would also
trip every wind farm connected to the system
for quite a large radius. This therefore means
that not only do we have to be able to withstand
the loss of Synergen but also every transmission-
connected wind farm within a large radius
as well. That is serious since the size of wind
farms is increasing. We have recently signed a
connection agreement for an 82.5 megawatt
wind farm.
These are the challenges we are facing. On top
of those, there are legislation issues and a lot of
uncertainties about where our generation and
our demand will come from, which is why we
do scenario planning and construct models. It
takes time to build in any reinforcements required to handle these various different
uncertainties.
So, as I said, even a small amount of generation
in some locations could result in a major transmission
project. It just depends what the existing
capacity is at that location and what impact
it has on the overall network. Transmission
projects to facilitate additional generation can
only begin when a relevant generator or
demand customer signs a connection agreement.
We operate that policy to avoid having
plant built which will subsequently be stranded.
Typical lead times for significant transmission
projects are currently from four to eight years.
This is much longer than in the past while the
typical lead-time for generation plant is about
one to three years, much shorter than in the past.
There is a mismatch here. From an economic
point of view, someone is losing if there is too
much generation in a particular location, be it
the generator or the system or the public.
Another issue for us is the reducing capacity
benefit of increasing wind power installation.
As the level of wind power generation on the
system increases, the plant margin required to
maintain system adequacy rises as well. As an
example, we have currently 150 megawatts of
wind connected to the system. Most of this is
connected to the distribution side - only about
15 megawatts is connected to transmission.
Recently we had a high load period and we
required generation and we had only 3
megawatts available at that point in time as the
wind farms had too little wind to produce.
Figure 5B4 shows this issue. It is an input that
ESB National Grid made to the Renewable
Energy Strategy Group. It looks at a system
peak of over 4000 megawatts which is not too
dissimilar from where we are at the moment
with only around 150 megawatts of wind
installed. We do get some capacity benefits
from that but as the windpower capacity
increases, we get less and less benefit from each
unit of wind capacity installed because we have
to provide a back-up for it in case it is not available.
An interconnector with another country's grid
can facilitate power flow in both directions.
Currently, as I said, we have interconnection
with Northern Ireland, which has interconnection
to the UK, into Scotland and down through
England and indeed England is interconnected
to Europe. I have drawn a double-headed arrow
between Wexford and Wales to represent possible
interconnection between the Republic of
Ireland and the UK. This is a proposal which
has been discussed for some time and it is currently
being reviewed again. The EU would like
to see greater interconnection and it has been
specified as 10% of installed capacity.
An interconnector would certainly be a significant
intrastructural project. It would bring
Ireland closer to the markets in the UK and it
would facilitate more competition in the Irish
market. Whether there would be cheaper
imports from the UK is questionable, however,
but it would give us energy-source diversity.
Imports through it could be seen as equivalent
to extra generation on the east coast; but, equally,
since the arrow goes the other way as well,
it could facilitate the export of power from
there. The various pros and cons and different
impacts are going to have to be taken into consideration
when interconnection is being
assessed.
We have put up a number of different information
documents on our website at www.eirgrid.com.
These mostly fall into the following categories:
system, charges, connection and market, and
one of the main pieces of information which
will be useful to people in the generation area,
is the forecast statement, which more or less
shows the network currently, the reinforcements
we intend to make, those for which we
have capital approval to complete, and what
capacity is available in the network for
increased generation etc.
We are involved in the British Isles Wind
Technical Panel, a group of TSOs and others
who want to be able to model power supplies
from wind farms just as they would model
those from any other large generator. We are
also a technical advisor to the Grid Investment
Steering Group and have submitted discussion
documents to the Commission for Electricity
Regulation (CER) on the implications of large
wind farms connecting to the grid and the specific
requirements of the grid for that. We've
been analysing various wind forecasting simulation
systems such as Prediktor, which is used
by one of the Danish utilities. We are involved
in an EU group called More Care, again to do
with wind forecasting, involving academics,
TSOs and industry people. We are also part of
another study on the impact of large amounts of
wind generation on the performance of other
generators if wind can't provide the generation
at a given point in time and other generators
have to. We have also made inputs into the joint
British Office of the Regulator of Electricity
Generation (OFREG) and CER wind study,
which is being carried out at present.
Technical advances could help increase the
amount of wind-generated energy that can be
connected to the transmission system without
diminishing the quality and continuity of supply.
For example, a number of turbine manufacturers
are working to improve the fault ride-through
capability I mentioned earlier because
the ESB is obviously not the only transmission
system operator to raise this issue with them.
The provision of frequency support and ancillary
services, currently available from the thermal
generators, is also important as the more
that large wind farms can act like traditional
power suppliers, the more people will be able to
enjoy the same quality of supply from the transmission
grid and yet have green energy.
Accuracy of wind forecasting is obviously a
major issue, and as I have said, we're doing a
significant amount of work on that at the
moment. Dispatchability, that is central control
for larger wind farms, is highly desirable as it
enables the TSO to actually instruct the wind
farms to switch on or off their banks of turbines.
And energy storage is obviously a key issue
because a wind farm with energy storage provides
the TSO with a lot of the advantages of
the traditional thermal generator.
A final comment. As Transmission System
Operator, as I have outlined, our main duty is
maintaining the integrity of the main grid. We
are currently working with a lot of wind farm
developers and a huge effort has been put in by
them and their manufacturers and consultants to
try to accommodate our needs when they are
discussing generator connections with us. That
is part of the way forward just as here today we
are trying to understand each others' needs and
establish a collaborative process for the future.
This is one of almost 50
chapters and articles in the 336-page large format book, Before the Wells
Run Dry. Copies of the book are available for £9.95 from Green Books. Continue to Part C of section 4:Selling Green Electricity: A Wind Farmer's View
Figure 5B1 is a thumbnail of a map showing the Irish transmission system:
it is made up of the 400KV system; the
220KV system; and the 110KV system. (To see a full-size version of the map in PDF format, click on the thumbnail). It is
distinct from the distribution system as Figure
5B2 shows.
RENEWABLES IN THE SUPPLY MIX
INTERCONNECTORS
ENERGY STORAGE